The Financial, Career, and Estate Consequences High-Net-Worth Families Cannot Ignore
Elder care is often framed as a family issue.
In reality, it is frequently a women’s issue.
Across income levels, women bear a disproportionate share of caregiving responsibilities for aging parents and relatives. In affluent households, the dynamics may look different on the surface, but the imbalance persists. The implications extend well beyond emotional labor. They affect earnings, long-term wealth accumulation, retirement security, estate planning outcomes, and intergenerational relationships.
For high-net-worth families, understanding this asymmetry is not simply a matter of fairness. It is a matter of structural financial risk.
________________________________________
The Data Is Clear
Women provide the majority of unpaid elder care in the United States.
According to the National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP, approximately 61 percent of family caregivers are women¹. Women also spend more hours per week providing care than men and are more likely to handle personal care tasks such as bathing, dressing, and medication management¹.
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that women are significantly more likely than men to reduce work hours or leave the workforce entirely due to caregiving responsibilities².
In addition:
• Women are more likely to experience career interruptions related to caregiving³
• Female caregivers lose an estimated $324,000 in lifetime wages and retirement benefits due to time out of the workforce⁴
• Women already retire with approximately 30 percent less in retirement savings compared to men on average⁵
These figures apply across income levels, but in high-net-worth households, the financial stakes are often higher. The opportunity cost of stepping back from leadership roles, equity participation, or professional partnerships can be substantial.
________________________________________
Why Affluent Women Are Not Immune
There is a common assumption that wealth neutralizes caregiving burdens.
Access to private care, home health aides, and assisted living facilities can certainly ease logistical strain. However, financial resources do not eliminate responsibility. They often shift it.
In many affluent families:
• Daughters are primary coordinators of care
• Female spouses manage aging in-laws
• Professional women shoulder decision-making oversight even when outside care is hired
Sociologist Dr. Emily Abel has observed, “Even in families with significant resources, women remain the default managers of aging parents’ needs. Wealth may change the tools available, but it rarely changes expectations.”⁶
The result is an invisible second career: elder care project management.
________________________________________
The Career and Equity Impact
For high-achieving women, elder care often coincides with peak earning years.
Many caregivers are in their late 40s, 50s, or early 60s, precisely when:
• Executive promotions occur
• Equity compensation vests
• Professional partnerships solidify
• Board opportunities emerge
A reduction in hours or missed advancement during this window has compounding consequences.
Harvard Business Review has documented that caregiving is one of the leading reasons mid-career women scale back professionally, often permanently⁷.
In high-net-worth families, this can translate into:
• Reduced ownership stakes
• Lower deferred compensation
• Smaller long-term equity participation
• Diminished leadership influence
The financial impact may not appear immediately. It unfolds over decades.
________________________________________
Longevity Multiplies the Effect
Women live longer than men on average.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, women’s life expectancy in the United States exceeds men’s by approximately five years⁸.
This creates a double burden:
• Women are more likely to provide care
• Women are more likely to need care later themselves
Longer life expectancy combined with interrupted earning years compounds retirement risk.
The paradox is stark. The very individuals most likely to sacrifice financially for elder care are also the ones statistically most likely to outlive their spouses and depend more heavily on long-term financial security.
________________________________________
The Emotional Load Is Financial
Elder care decisions are rarely purely rational.
Caregiving often involves:
• Guilt
• Obligation
• Cultural expectation
• Family hierarchy
Dr. Linda Fried, Dean of Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health, has stated, “Caregiving is not simply a task. It is an identity. And identities shape financial behavior.”⁹
Women frequently hesitate to:
• Track the financial cost of caregiving
• Quantify lost earnings
• Seek compensation or adjustment within family structures
In affluent families, this can lead to unspoken resentment, imbalance in estate planning, or misaligned expectations among siblings.
________________________________________
Estate Planning Often Overlooks This Imbalance
Many estate plans divide assets evenly among heirs.
Equal distribution, however, does not always reflect equal contribution.
If one daughter reduces her career to coordinate parental care for years while siblings remain professionally uninterrupted, strict equality may feel inequitable.
Research from wealth advisory firms consistently shows that perceived fairness, not numerical equality, determines whether estates foster harmony or conflict¹⁰.
Some families address this proactively through:
• Lifetime gifting adjustments
• Compensation for caregiving time
• Structured family agreements
• Explicit recognition in estate documents
Without intentional discussion, caregiving inequities often surface only after death, when resolution becomes more complicated.
________________________________________
Long-Term Financial Consequences
The financial consequences for women who provide elder care can include:
• Reduced Social Security benefits due to fewer earning years²
• Lower employer retirement contributions
• Diminished compound growth from missed equity awards
• Increased stress and burnout affecting long-term health
A report from the AARP Public Policy Institute notes that caregiving-related workforce exits disproportionately affect women’s long-term retirement readiness¹¹.
In high-net-worth families, the absolute numbers may differ, but the structural dynamic remains.
Wealth can absorb cost. It cannot erase opportunity cost.
________________________________________
What High-Net-Worth Families Can Do
Affluent families are uniquely positioned to mitigate these risks if they address them directly.
Effective approaches include:
Explicit Role Definition
Clarify who will manage elder care logistics and what authority accompanies that responsibility.
Financial Recognition
Acknowledge career tradeoffs openly and consider mechanisms to compensate or rebalance contributions.
Integrated Planning
Coordinate elder care planning with retirement, tax, and estate strategies.
Early Conversation
Discuss expectations before caregiving intensifies, not after strain emerges.
Intentional design reduces silent sacrifice.
________________________________________
The Strategic Reality
Elder care is not gender neutral.
Women disproportionately carry its weight. They experience greater career disruption, lower lifetime earnings, and longer retirement horizons.
In affluent families, these dynamics may be obscured by financial comfort, but they do not disappear.
As Dr. Janet Gornick, Director of the Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality, has written, “Gender inequality in caregiving is one of the most durable forms of economic inequality.”¹²
High-net-worth families that fail to recognize this imbalance risk creating unintended financial and emotional consequences that extend across generations.
Addressing it directly is not only equitable. It is prudent wealth stewardship.
Learn how proactive elder care planning can protect careers, preserve wealth, and reduce family strain — schedule a confidential conversation with our team today.
Sources
¹ National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP, Caregiving in the U.S. Report
² U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, American Time Use Survey
³ Pew Research Center, Gender and Caregiving Data
⁴ MetLife Mature Market Institute, Caregiving Costs Study
⁵ Federal Reserve, Survey of Consumer Finances
⁶ Emily Abel, Sociologist and Caregiving Researcher
⁷ Harvard Business Review, The Career Cost of Caregiving
⁸ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Life Expectancy Statistics
⁹ Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Dr. Linda Fried
¹⁰ Williams Group Wealth Consultancy, Family Wealth Transfer Research
¹¹ AARP Public Policy Institute, Retirement Security and Caregiving
¹² Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality, Gender and Economic Disparities
Investment advisory and financial planning services offered through Bleakley Financial Group, LLC, an SEC registered investment adviser, doing business as OnePoint BFG Wealth Partners (herein referred to as “OnePoint BFG”). For more information regarding OnePoint BFG including important disclosures, please visit https://adviserinfo.sec.gov/.
The third-party information contained herein is provided for informational and discussion purposes only. OnePoint BFG does not represent this third-party information as its own. While OnePoint BFG has gathered this information from sources deemed to be reliable, OnePoint BFG has not reviewed or verified any information input by your financial professional or that of the third-party source, nor can OnePoint BFG guarantee the completeness or accuracy of this data.
OnePoint BFG does not offer legal or tax advice. This document is not a substitute for the advice of a qualified attorney or tax professional. You should not take any action based solely on the information provided on this report without seeking legal counsel from a licensed attorney or tax professional in your jurisdiction. No attorney-client relationship is formed by your use of this document.
OnePoint BFG often uses Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) in the generation of marketing and advertising and has established policies to ensure all AI generated material goes through human review prior to dissemination. This communication has been provided for general informational and discussion purposes only, and should not be considered as investment, legal or tax advice or as a recommendation. OnePoint BFG does not represent any third-party information used as its own. Please contact your legal counsel or tax advisor to recommend the application of this general information to any particular situation or prepare an instrument chosen to implement the design discussed herein.
This communication has been provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment, legal or tax advice or as a recommendation. This material provides general information only. OnePoint BFG does not offer legal or tax advice. Please contact legal counsel or your tax advisor to recommend the application of this general information to any particular situation or prepare an instrument chosen to implement the design discussed herein. Circular 230 notice: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, this notice is to inform you that any tax advice included in this communication, including any attachments, is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalty or promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter.
OP 26-0181
